Mark Beall
Activity
Reported issues: 0
06/20/2011
- 04:32 pm ITAPS iRel: RE: Changing from iRel_NOTEXIST
- The reason for having the NOTEXIST state is for implementations to be able to have relations where they only provide ...
06/17/2011
- 10:52 am ITAPS iMeshP: RE: 2 fundamental questions about iMeshP
- Tim Tautges wrote:
> Hi all,
> Jason and I sat down and talked about iMeshP today, and we came away with two fund...
05/26/2011
- 12:58 pm ITAPS iRel: RE: Replacing iRel_BOTH with "recursive"
- Tim Tautges wrote:
>
> Recall that a relation with a BOTH type on a side means that both the Sets and Ents on that... - 09:56 am ITAPS iRel: RE: Replacing iRel_BOTH with "recursive"
- I'm completely missing something since I don't understand how the word "recursive" applies here.
04/29/2011
- 10:03 am ITAPS iMesh: RE: iBase_CreationStatus in iMesh_createEnt
- Tim Tautges wrote:
> The mesher didn't fill in the hole; the hole is still there topologically, it just has zero a...
04/28/2011
- 06:51 pm ITAPS iMesh: RE: iBase_CreationStatus in iMesh_createEnt
- Mark Miller wrote:
> Tim Tautges wrote:
> > So, just for grins, I created a model with cubit that looked like this:... - 02:53 pm ITAPS iMesh: RE: iBase_CreationStatus in iMesh_createEnt
- Mark Miller wrote:
> Mark Beall wrote:
> > I think that, if the application is worried about creating duplicate, it... - 02:50 pm ITAPS iMesh: RE: iBase_CreationStatus in iMesh_createEnt
> I think that if the function fails (returns error code other than iBase_SUCCESS) then it should have create no en...- 01:37 pm ITAPS iMesh: RE: iBase_CreationStatus in iMesh_createEnt
- I think that, if the application is worried about creating duplicate, it should check if the entity is a duplicate be...
04/20/2011
- 05:49 pm ITAPS Specification #193: Should we remove iBase_NO_MESH_DATA?
- Simmetrix is in the process of updating our interface to the 1.2 release. Will keep you posted.
Also available in: Atom